BLOGS
Our guest blogs offer their personal insights and observations on integrated reporting, sustainability reporting and governance.
Sustainability reporting: Different formats
A single sustainability report or separate reports for different sustainability topics? This blog explores how disclosures from various sustainability standards can be layered, and considers the purpose of an online data book.
King V and reporting
The King V Code of Corporate Governance was released on 31 October 2025 and, like its predecessor, it firmly entrenches the integrated report and integrated thinking.
Understanding the draft King V Code: What it means for corporate reporting
On 26 June 2025, I was asked to speak on a webinar panel hosted by Tangelo and the Investor Relations Society of South Africa. It was an interesting topic: Regulatory landscape – What is changing in South African corporate reporting.
How to achieve a concise integrated report
Know anyone who just loves to read a long integrated report? A report where it is hard to see what matters and what’s really important because there is so much detailed information?
What to watch for in 2025?
A lot of everything around the world, it seems, but on the corporate reporting side… The ISSB is expected to release exposure draft standards or guidance for two key projects.
A double act
Over the past two years, the IRC has released two interrelated Information Papers. Both have been well received locally and internationally.
What is in store for 2024?
After the last few years of high change, what is in store for corporate and integrated reporting in 2024? Of great directional relevance are the results of the ISSB’s request for stakeholder input on what projects they should tackle.
What is in store for corporate reporting in 2023
2023 will bring more changes for corporate reporting. The tumult of the past few years has seen the rise of international sustainability reporting standards and the falling away of some beloved reporting organisations in the midst of industry consolidation.
Change at a pace
Things are moving quickly in international corporate reporting… and there’s more change afoot. On 31 March 2022, the ISSB released its first two IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards – a general requirements draft standard and a climate draft standard.
A basis for the new ISSB standards
The IFRS Foundation’s Technical Readiness Working Group released three documents of import on 3 November 2021. The General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information Prototype, the Climate-related Disclosures Prototype and the Supplement: Technical Protocols.
The VRF… the great Houdini act
The Value Reporting Foundation (VRF) was formed in July 2021 through the merger of the IIRC and the SASB. On 3 November 2021, the VRF announced that, together with the Climate Disclosure Standards Board, it will be consolidated into the new International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).
What’s going on in corporate reporting?
There’s a lot going on in the international corporate reporting arena, leaving many bewildered and bemused, and some a tad irritated, as the main players jostle to get their agendas met.
What makes a ‘quality integrated report’?
Over the 10 years of integrated reporting in South Africa, I have been asked many times as to what makes a ‘quality integrated report’. It is, for sure, the mindful adherence to the 19 requirements of the International Framework.
Ten years of integrated reporting celebrated in a crisis: What lies ahead? A round-up of the IRC Annual Conference 2020
In a volatile operating environment, issues seem to rise to the surface. There’s no place to hide. Our current context has certainly catalysed broadscale rethinking of business as usual.
The emergence of integrated reporting assurance
Integrated reporting assurance is emerging, and its place in the pathway to the audit of the future is becoming clearer.
Individual, collective action: Can this move integrated thinking forward?
2020 has, so far, been a global uphill battle against the coronavirus pandemic.
Our beloved Framework gets a re‑look
After 10 years, the International Framework is being refreshed by the IIRC. Fear not, it’s not a wholesale revision, but rather a modernisation.
International view: Integrated reporting – a trouble-shooter for Indian reporting
Over the past few years, corporate reporting in India has evolved a lot. The main agenda was to change the conventional and complex reporting formats to crisper and more relevant reporting.
CSSA Integrated Reporting Awards 2019 – the judges’ perspective
The objective of the CSSA IR Awards, one of the longest-running awards for excellent reporting in Southern Africa, is to encourage innovation and excellence in integrated reporting. It is also extremely comprehensive, comprising 10 categories.
The IR is the story of the company
In South Africa, the common law has always been that directors owe their duties and responsibilities to the company.
IRC of SA delivers stunning conference
The IRC Annual Conference 2019 took place at the Johannesburg Stock Exchange on 18 July. The event affirmed that integrated reporting is receiving ongoing focus.
I was inspired: 2019 International Integrated Reporting Conference
What could Africa learn from the 2019 International Integrated Reporting Conference hosted in London on 16-17 May 2019?
To and from Frankfurt, Germany for the IIRC Council meeting
I attended the IIRC Council meeting in Frankfurt on 11 April. It was well worth the effort of 20 hours’ flying.
Why are integrated reports not referring to the Sustainable Development Goals?
In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Sustainable Development Goals, with targets to achieve by 2030.
Observations on integrated reports
I recently spent time reading the integrated reports of some of the top 40 companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
An adjudicator’s viewpoint
Based on a speech at the EY Awards event held in Johannesburg on 3 August 2018.
Sri Lanka taking off
The fourth annual CMA Excellence in Integrated Reporting Awards took place in Colombo, Sri Lanka in July 2018.
International developments in IR
Based on a speech at the IIRC-ICGN Global Conference held in Tokyo, Japan on 1 March 2018.
Reporting value creation through materiality
GreymatterFinch’s clients come from a diverse range of industries, and despite their different operating environments, a common trend has become clear in the last two years.
Why South Africa will continue to play a leading role in integrated reporting globally
After my opening address at the Nkonki IR Awards held at the JSE on 21 August 2017, some of the attendees asked for a written version of my speech, so here it is.
Have integrated report – will travel
Our integrated reports, since the first in 2010, have progressively moved from focusing purely on the previous period’s financial performance towards a more integrated view of other aspects of the business and the operating context.
10 years of IR
This blog first appeared in the IIRC’s 10-year anniversary publication. On the ground floor of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange is a restaurant. It is a busy place, with people coming and going.
INTEGRATED REPORTING AWARDS IN SOUTH AFRICA
There are two main award programmes for integrated reports in South Africa. Each award programme has its own marksheet, ranking system and judges. The EY Awards cover the JSE top 100 companies. The CGISA/JSE Awards cover listed companies, unlisted companies, state-owned entities, NPOs and others.
CGISA/JSE integrated reporting awards
(Previously CSSA/JSE integrated reporting awards)
For this award programme, organisations have to enter their integrated report.
EY Excellence in integrated reporting awards
This award programme covers all publicly available integrated reports for the top 100 JSE-listed companies.
SOUTH AFRICAN COMPANY REPORTS
South Africa has been at the forefront of integrated reporting since the publication of the King Report on Governance for South Africa, 2009 (King III) and the inclusion of its principles in the JSE Listing Requirements in 2010. Today, South African companies continue to lead by example, adopting considered approaches to their corporate reporting suites.
South Africa has not, at this stage, mandated the ISSB sustainability standards. However, some larger listed and non-listed companies have voluntarily adopted these standards in their corporate reporting. This is in addition to these companies’ existing sustainability reporting, which covers impacts using the GRI Standards and others.
The reports below show how some large listed companies structured their 2025 integrated reports and sustainability disclosures. The ‘octopus’ (or umbrella) approach is commonly used in South Africa – this positions the integrated report as the primary report with other subject-specific detailed supplementary reports. For the approaches see the trilogy of Information Papers issued by the IRC:
LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL NEWS
Keep up with local and international news shaping integrated reporting and corporate disclosure in South Africa.
GRI is the most widely used sustainability reporting standard
A new global survey finds the GRI is the most widely used sustainability disclosure standard, with GRI reporters accounting for 62% of global market capitalisation. The survey, The State of Sustainability Reporting: Global Trends in the GRI Standards 2025, covered published reports from almost 15 000 listed companies across 132 jurisdictions. The survey highlighted that sustainability reporting is a multi-framework practice, with companies also referencing the TCFD, SASB, CDP, ISSB, ESRS and TNFD.
GRI and ISSB working to align sustainability disclosures
The GRI and ISSB are working towards a seamless, global and comprehensive sustainability reporting system. The two global standard-setters are working to “identify and align common disclosures” and “explain how their complementary disclosures can be used together to facilitate efficient reporting for entities choosing or being mandated to meet the information needs of investors and other stakeholders”.
IRBA adopts latest international assurance standard
The Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) in South Africa has adopted the new ISSA 5000, General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements. The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board released ISSA 5000 in November 2024. ISSA 5000 applies to sustainability information across any topic and under multiple reporting standards, and can be applied by accountants and non-accountants in performing sustainability assurance engagements.
Draft simplified ESRS released
An updated and simplified version of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards was released by EFRAG on 3 December 2025. The suite of standards is still in draft form. The final version is expected in the coming months.
New King V Code is out
The King VTM Code on Corporate Governance for South Africa, 2025 was released by the Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA) on 31 October 2025. It simplifies King IV and includes updates for sustainability reporting, technology governance and legislative changes, as well as increased focus on integrated thinking and ethical leadership. King V is effective for financial years commencing on or after 1 January 2026.
Sustainability reporting sentiment SA survey
Alexforbes and CIPIC released the results of their national survey in South Africa in July 2025. The survey covers the appetite for reporting as well as the frameworks and standards currently used. King IV and the Integrated Reporting Framework came out tops as the most used frameworks, followed by the SDGs, GRI standards and JSE Sustainability Disclosure Guidance.
JSE Sustainability Disclosure Guidance
The JSE has kept its voluntary sustainability guidance as is after a review last year. The guidance was first issued in June 2022. It covers general sustainability and specific guidance on climate change.
New standard on sustainability assurance
The long-awaited ISSA 5000, General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements has been released. The standard from the IAASB is the global standard for sustainability assurance and can be applied to any sustainability standard or framework by any assurance practitioner.
ISSB guidance on identifying sustainability risks
The ISSB has released educational guidance to help companies with “the fundamental task of identifying and disclosing material information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect their cash flows, their access to finance or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term”.
A really useful guide on double materiality
In May 2024, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group released EFRAG IG1, Materiality Assessment. This is a really useful read for understanding double materiality and how it can be implemented.
A new era: S1 and S2
The ISSB has released its first two sustainability disclosure standards: IFRS S1, General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information and IFRS S2, Climate-related Disclosures. The standards are positioned as a ‘global baseline’ to which a country’s national reporting requirements and practices and multi-stakeholder sustainability standards (e.g., GRI) can be ‘layered’. The ISSB standards are voluntary unless mandated by a country’s national reporting authority for legal enforcement. The ISSB has released supplementary documents, including guidance, on the standards.
An interconnected approach to sustainability standards
The IFRS Foundation and the GRI have signed an MoU to align capital market (IFRS Foundation) and multi-stakeholder (GRI) standards to create an interconnected approach for sustainability disclosures. The compatibility should ease the reporting burden on preparers.
JSE Sustainability Disclosure Guidance
In June 2022, the JSE released two guidance papers on sustainability and climate disclosure for listed companies. The papers serve as guidance and are not a part of the JSE Listings Requirements.
IFAC and IIRC push for assurance
The joint thought leadership paper released by the IIRC and the International Federation of Accountants in February 2021 explains the status quo and the difference between reasonable and limited assurance, and sets out the way forward in an easy-read format.
Enterprise value reporting
The Reporting on Enterprise Value paper shows how existing sustainability guidelines and the recommendations of the TFCD can be used to achieve global standards for sustainability-related financial disclosure.
Value Reporting Foundation
The IIRC has announced its intention to merge with the US-based Sustainability Accounting Standards Board to form the Value Reporting Foundation. The move exemplifies the fast pace of change in the international corporate reporting arena.
A move to work together
Corporate reporters will be happy about the announced commitment by the CDP, CSDP, GRI, SASB and IIRC to work together to achieve comprehensive, globally accepted corporate reporting. The move could prompt a broader rationalisation among the plethora of sustainability frameworks facing corporate reporters.
Revision of the International <IR> Framework
2020 is the year of change for the International Framework. The revision is a ‘modernisation’ rather than a wholesale revision and deals with targeted areas. The process kicked off with the release of three topic papers for public comment, followed by a consultation draft for public comment.
Factors associated with better quality integrated reporting
This publication by the Centre for Critical Accounting and Auditing Research at Wits University outlines the benefits and drivers of better quality reporting. Impediments to high-quality reporting are also covered.
How to do an integrated report and other IR topics
A recording of the Good Governance Academy’s conference, held in May 2020, is available to view.
Integrated Thinking and Strategy State of Play Report 2020
This report from the IIRC’s Integrated Thinking group introduces a new model for integrated thinking called the ‘Spring model’.
South African reports lead in quality
A global survey gives top honours to SA reports. The survey covered 10 countries and was conducted by Professor Bob Eccles, Michael Krzus and Carlos Solano. The work of the IRC of SA is mentioned as a factor in the success and quality of reporting.
Purpose of the corporation redefined
The Business Roundtable, America’s most influential group of corporate leaders, has released a statement on the purpose of a corporation. It proposes that a company has a broader responsibility to society, which it can better serve if it considers all stakeholders in its business decisions.
Innovation in Banking: Are we communicating the value created?
This paper from the Banking Network of the IIRC, published in March 2017, focuses on innovation and R&D in the international banking sector.
IFAC endorses integrated reporting
The International Federation of Accountants released its Policy Position 8 (Enhancing organizational reporting: Integrated reporting key) in January 2017, setting out its strong support for integrated reporting.
King IV ushers in a new era
The King IV Report on Corporate GovernanceTM for South Africa, 2016, released on 1 November 2016, emphasises the integrated report and integrated thinking.
Survey of JSE Top 40 company reports
PwC’s 19th Annual Global CEO Survey reveals that embedding sustainability thinking is becoming a mainstream approach to corporate reporting. The survey also provides a roadmap and SA trends.
The rise of integrated thinking
Two global research surveys of global CEOs and C-suite execs highlight the need for integrated thinking in business.
KPMG survey of business reporting
The survey evaluates 270 annual reports from public companies in 16 countries. It looks at the quantitative and qualitative information in relation to the business model, strategy, performance and risk across 15 sectors.
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS
Since 2019, there has been a concerted global effort to build a comprehensive corporate reporting system that integrates sustainability reporting, with a focus on consolidating the many sustainability standards and frameworks facing preparers.
In September 2020, the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), together with the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), issued a statement of intent to work together to achieve greater alignment.
In December 2020, this group (known as the ‘gang of five’) released Reporting on Enterprise Value, a prototype showing how their existing sustainability guidelines and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations could be consolidated to form global standards for climate-related financial disclosures, with the potential to extend to other ESG matters. The paper was significant in offering a prototype for future global sustainability reporting standards.
In November 2020, the IIRC announced its intention to merge with the US-based SASB in June 2021 to form the Value Reporting Foundation (VRF).
In September 2020, the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation – the governing body of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), which issues global financial reporting standards – issued a consultation paper on whether to develop sustainability reporting standards. Following positive public feedback, it announced in February 2021 that it would proceed with establishing an International Sustainability Standards Board. In April 2021, it released a feedback statement summarising public comments, along with an exposure draft on proposed constitutional changes. The ISSB would provide investor-focused global sustainability standards, initially covering climate change before extending to other areas such as nature and human capital.
The ISSB was officially launched at COP 26 in Glasgow on 3 November 2021, with its standards named the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. The launch also announced the consolidation of the technical expertise and resources of the VRF and CDSB into the ISSB – a process completed in August 2022, resulting in the full absorption of both organisations.
Alongside the launch, the Technical Readiness Working Group (TRWG) – a multi-body group comprising the VRF, CDSB, IASB, TCFD and World Economic Forum (WEF) – released three prototype papers: General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information Prototype, Climate-related Disclosures Prototype and its Supplement: Technical Protocols. These prototypes, available on the IFRS website, formed the basis of the two inaugural exposure drafts issued by the ISSB on 31 March 2022.
On 31 March 2022, the ISSB released its first two exposure drafts for public comment – one on general sustainability-related financial disclosure requirements, and the other on climate-related disclosures. Comments were due by 29 July 2022. Following over 1 600 responses, the ISSB released its first two standards, IFRS S1 and S2, on 26 June 2023. The ISSB standards are positioned as the global baseline for sustainability disclosure reporting. The standards are voluntary unless mandated by a national authority.
On 4 May 2023, the ISSB issued a global survey inviting input on four short-listed projects for its future work programme: biodiversity (nature), human rights, human capital, and integration in reporting. In May 2024, the ISSB announced it would prioritise biodiversity and human capital for its 2024/25 technical programme, with an exposure draft on nature expected in late 2026.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), the global body of capital markets regulators representing 170 jurisdictions, has played a pivotal role in the process of reshaping global corporate reporting. IOSCO chairs the IFRS Monitoring Board, which oversees the IFRS Foundation Trustees, who in turn oversee the IASB and ISSB.
In July 2023, IOSCO endorsed the ISSB standards – a significant move that places pressure on individual stock exchanges to determine if and how they will adopt the standards in their markets.
In May 2021, the IASB released an exposure draft on its Management Commentary Practice Note, open for comment until November 2021. The revised IFRS Practice Statement 1, Management Commentary was issued on 23 June 2025.
The IASB and ISSB are now the bodies responsible for the Integrated Reporting Framework. Recognising its international popularity, the IFRS Foundation has encouraged organisations to adopt and continue using the Framework for their integrated reports. Staff from the former IIRC have been absorbed into the IFRS Foundation, and support for the Framework continues. The former IIRC became the Integrated Reporting and Connectivity Council (IRCC) and served as an advisory body to the IFRS Foundation on integrated reporting and integrated thinking until April 2026. There is now an Integrated Reporting Community Leaders forum comprising the IR national bodies of various jurisdictions and other stakeholders.
Use of the Framework has increased globally by approximately 20% over the past few years.
On 29 April 2022, the EU released 12 exposure drafts of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards for public comment until 8 August 2022. The exposure drafts are based on double materiality and cover general principles, general disclosure requirements, climate, pollution, water and marine resources, biodiversity and ecosystems, resource use and circular economy, own workforce, workers in the value chain, affected communities, consumers and end-users, governance, and business conduct.
Following consideration of public comments, the updated ESRS drafts were submitted to the European Commission in November 2022 and adopted in July 2023. The standards apply from financial year 2024 in a phased-in approach based on company size, affecting many EU organisations and some non-EU companies operating in the EU that meet certain thresholds.
In June 2024, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) issued implementation guidance on materiality assessment, the value chain and ESRS datapoints.
In July 2025, EFRAG released revised and simplified exposure drafts of all 12 standards, reducing the number of datapoints to ease the reporting burden on preparers. In December 2025, the new simplified ESRS (draft) were issued, requiring ratification by the European Commission before becoming final.
The GRI has issued sustainability reporting standards to meet the information needs of multiple stakeholders, including investors, since 1997. This multi-stakeholder perspective differentiates the GRI Standards from the ISSB Standards, although the ESRS align with the GRI’s approach. The GRI Standards are voluntary.
Many GRI Standards informed the development of the ESRS, and there is a high level of interoperability. The GRI has also established a memorandum of understanding with the ISSB to achieve further interoperability and alignment.
A 2025 global survey, The State of Sustainability Reporting: Global Trends in the GRI Standards 2025, covering almost 15 000 listed companies across 132 jurisdictions, found that GRI is the most widely used sustainability disclosure standard, with GRI reporters accounting for 62% of global market capitalisation. The survey also highlighted that sustainability reporting is a multi-framework practice, with companies also referencing the TCFD, SASB, CDP, ISSB, ESRS and Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD).
The various sustainability standards adopt different materiality perspectives, which determine what information must be disclosed:
- Financial materiality (investor materiality): Information is material if omitting, obscuring or misstating it could reasonably be expected to influence investor decisions. This aligns with the IASB’s definition and is used in the ISSB standards.
- Impact materiality: An organisation’s material (actual or potential, positive or negative) impacts on people or the natural environment. Used in the GRI standards.
- Double materiality: Combines financial materiality and impact materiality. Used in the ESRS.
The ISSB promotes its standards as representing the ‘global baseline’ – i.e., the minimum standards for sustainability reporting that meets investor needs. This baseline can then be ‘layered’ with additional information, including regional requirements (e.g., ESRS), multi-stakeholder standards (e.g., GRI), and country-specific national requirements.
In May 2026, the GRI and ISSB issued a joint statement confirming they are working together to enable a seamless, global and comprehensive sustainability reporting system. The two global standard-setters are working to “identify and align common disclosures” and “explain how their complementary disclosures can be used together to facilitate efficient reporting for entities choosing or being mandated to meet the information needs of investors and other stakeholders”.
To elevate sustainability disclosures to the same level as financial disclosures, assurance has become a critical element.
In November 2024, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) released International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA) 5000, General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements – a standalone standard that leverages existing IAASB guidance (including ISAE 3000 (revised) and ISAE 3410 on greenhouse gas statements). ISSA 5000 covers all elements of a sustainability assurance engagement for both limited and reasonable assurance, provides specificity for priority areas, can include assurance of the integrated report, and applies to sustainability information across any topic and under multiple frameworks.
In January 2025, the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) released a new standard addressing ethics and independence requirements for sustainability assurance engagements. Both standards are not profession-specific and can be used by accountants and non-accountants.
In addition, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) has issued supplemental guidance on achieving effective internal control of sustainability reporting.
ACADEMIC RESEARCH
Research library
This page lists the academic research papers on integrated reporting in South Africa, covering the period from 2012 to the present. The papers explore various aspects of integrated reporting practice, including its adoption, implementation, benefits and challenges.
2026
Interested in doing specific research?
Here are some potential topic ideas for research on integrated reporting and integrated thinking. Please let us know if you will be addressing a topic from the list below and your expected completion date, or if you have other research topics to suggest.
- How is integrated reporting best communicated (e.g., use of visuals and interactive web formats)?
- What skillsets and competencies are required across disciplines (such as finance, sustainability, or technology) to produce meaningful integrated reports?
- The economic costs and organisational trade-offs associated with implementing integrated reporting and integrated thinking frameworks, and whether these outweigh the perceived benefits.
- How organisations have embedded integrated thinking.
- How can organisations operationalise integrated thinking?
- What is the relation between the implementation of integrated thinking and business success or improved firm value?
- The relevance of outcomes-based governance for the successful application of integrated thinking.
- Adapting integrated thinking frameworks/measurement criteria/indicators for organisations that increasingly rely on artificial intelligence (AI) and automation in decision-making.
- What are the behavioural drivers of and barriers to adopting integrated thinking within senior leadership and operational teams?
- How national or organisational cultures influence the implementation and understanding of integrated thinking.
- The extent to which organisations are applying integrated thinking principles beyond their boundaries. Put differently, how is integrated thinking impacting the value chain, such as upstream suppliers and downstream users?
- The influence of algorithmic and AI-driven decision-making systems on the application (or erosion) of integrated thinking principles within organisations.
- A cross-disciplinary analysis of integrated thinking. In other words, how can integrated thinking practices in professions such as engineering or medicine be adapted and applied to assurance and sustainability reporting?
- The role of incentive structures and performance management systems in promoting or inhibiting integrated thinking.
- The extent to which integrated thinking can be measured as a cognitive capability of decision-makers, rather than inferred from disclosures or performance indicators.
- The challenges encountered or expected to be encountered by organisations adopting sustainability disclosure standards S1 and S2, and how these can be overcome.
- Synthesising the sustainability discourse: highlighting key similarities and tensions between existing sustainability frameworks (both minor and major frameworks).
- The practical challenges of interoperability between ISSB, GRI and ESRS frameworks (both minor and more common frameworks).
- The extent to which interoperability between the ISSB’s standards and those issued by other bodies (such as the EU) could be achieved in practice, keeping in mind the existing variations in sustainability reporting guidelines and requirements in different jurisdictions.
- The advantages and disadvantages of the ISSB’s approach of framing sustainability-related reporting as part of an economic discourse, including its approach to materiality determination.
- The challenges of collecting credible and complete data for compiling sustainability reports under S1 and S2 and the GRI. Recommendations for addressing existing limitations, for example, by applying data management techniques, refining internal control systems, or using AI.
- Methods for incorporating environmental, social and governance factors into management systems, internal controls, valuations, key performance indicators and risk appraisals.
- How academic research on issues like biodiversity reporting, extinction accounting and ecological accounting can be incorporated practically into sustainability reports prepared under S1 and S2, and/or be adapted by the ISSB when it develops further standards.
- Outcomes and organisational cash flow: how do companies’ outcomes/impacts on society and the environment affect their cash flow in the short, medium and long term?
- How companies are integrating climate resilience scenarios into their strategic outlook and capital allocation decisions, and how this is disclosed in integrated reports.
- How the notions of ‘impact’ and ‘financial materiality’ have informed the setting of standards, and the implications for theory and practice.
- Technical and conceptual analysis of the differences between ‘financial’ or ‘economic impact’ materiality and ‘double’ materiality, and the implications for report preparers, users and regulators.
- Tensions between financial materiality and double materiality, and their implications for report preparers, users and assurance providers.
- What is the effect of disclosure of strategy, business model, and outlook on market competitiveness and other measures of a successful business?
- Long-term versus short-term considerations in reporting and corporate decision-making processes.
- Stakeholder-inclusive versus investor-focused reporting: does taking a specific slant really make a difference?
- How machine learning and natural language processing tools can enhance assurance processes for non-financial disclosures.
- The role of blockchain in enhancing data verifiability and trustworthiness (assurance) in integrated and sustainability reports.
- The development of assurance methodologies for forward-looking and scenario-based disclosures (e.g., climate risk).
- How organisations can leverage AI to develop an integrated report, implement integrated thinking, and support data collection and monitoring for extra-financial information.
INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH AND SURVEYS
Correlation between corporate reporting using the Integrated Reporting Framework and company performance in the Malaysian market in relation to market value, cost of capital, and investor confidence
This study offers insights into the relationship between integrated reporting adoption and firm performance in Malaysia, an environment described as having initially low awareness but emerging interest. The results imply that integrated reporting adoption is positively related to market value and negatively related to the cost of capital, reinforcing signalling theory by indicating that increased transparency mitigates information asymmetry and signals firms’ reputational strength.
Nevertheless, its association with financial performance is insignificant. Qualitatively, stakeholders evaluate integrated reporting’s usefulness from three perspectives:
- informational, by increasing transparency and long-term orientation;
- interpretative, by developing integrated thinking; and
- decisional, by enhancing investor confidence and business reputation.
The findings generally indicate that IR’s key benefits relate to reputation, stakeholder confidence, and market legitimacy, supporting signalling, stakeholder, and institutional theories, rather than creating short-term financial value.
This research is conducted by a team of researchers from Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK) for a research project under the MAREF PRT Programme by MAREF, a foundation established by the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA). The researchers are led by Dr. Siti Afiqah Binti Zainuddin. Other team members are Prof. Madya Dr. Noorul Azwin Binti Md Nasir, Dr. Tahirah Binti Abdullah, and Dr. Amira Binti Jamil.